Sunday, June 28, 2009

Status-msg saga...on MJ's death. RIP MJ.

Micheal Jackson died (25th June'09). I wrote something on my facebook status-message. Friends commented on that. It was the most funniest debate I ever had on status-message! I am just copy-pasting all those here.

Aru:

{{ Don't know about his personal life BUT the world lost one charisma...we miss you the king of "black or white". }}


Patrick Brown:
A quick end to the life of one of the most interesting figures in music. It's sad but ultimately very fitting. Watching all the footage of his life I can't help but zone out and stare at his nose.

Saurav Kajaria:
At least
39 charities lost a sponsor..
Few Millions of $'s lost in Scholarship money..
Few thousand deprived children lost a support..
Million's of fans who love him for what good he did feel deprived..

How very fitting and just was all this!!??

Patrick Brown:
My personal opinion is that when these stars die young as they do more frequently than rest of us it fits because we depend on them to take us to a new reality. The reality of aging and not being able to think, sing, or dance doesn't fit our fantasies that inspire us. The world is better with j

Patrick Brown:
My comment got cut, but you get the picture.

Saurav Kajaria:
If the fantasy is shallow like you just said.. it doesn't matter if one such star dies.. If a person has the IQ to look beyond song and dance, he will realize that the survival of such people like everyone else comes with a greater good.. With the power to influence people who have not even heard their big names and platinum singles!

Aru:
Poopy (nickname, I've given to Patrick), i luv u BUT i don't agree with ur argument.
Hope
Saurav had awesome approach to summarize such a charisma in a tiny status msg. (Thanks facebook; at least no twitter-limit!)

"like(sic) the old
Indian proverb don't judge a man until you've walked 2 moons in his Moccasins (sic).... " -MJ (in his MOONWALK). In 'moonwalk', he did not revealed himself and he told that he is going write another one which we are never going to get!! Nobody knows, it might have been a new phase of after-lawsuit MJ.
if u c "
abc" from Jackson5, u can feel the fire in that kid's eye. So, he started entertaining children. it's one phase in that decade.
2
nd phase is defining new hip-hop dancing. not only inventing 'moonwalk' but redefining the word POP.
even Md. Ali lost for consecutive 3 yrs and after that he came back with REAL Md. Ali. So,
poopy...we never know MJ could have been come back with a brand new avatar to our generation i orZ(/post Y).May be we should focus more on magic of mj not the madness.

Patrick Brown:
You people are all the same... Jacko lovers. I can appreciate your thoughts. At the same time we must all agree that after the eighties it was way down hill for michael Jackson. P.s. Don't call him mj. It's insulting to the real mj, michael air Jordan.

Aru:
i don't know Patrick...i m not 'cultured' BUT (may be) michael AIR jordan is most popular with AIR JORDAN! may be he self claimed himself by MJ. i just google by MJ and no air jordon came out!! and the world gave jackson the MJ name!




Wednesday, June 3, 2009

HATE is the answer. LOVE?!

Love is the answer.
No, HATE. My thinking is kind of based on modern philosophy deconstruction and OSHO's philosophy which is based on Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism.

Here is the contemplating idea of Love-Hate.
Have you ever imagined a world of Love; real love; ONLY love. Probably you could not imagine because from our childhood we are all possessed by love. Mom, Dad and family nourished us with love. When we feel the scarcity of love; we feel pain. In other words, when we feel hate, we realize the necessity of love. The word LOVE with its meaning does not exists without hate. It fulfils another; likewise Good and Evil, Light and Darkness. If you never know what darkness is then you definitely never know what is light. It's typical old school philosophy. 
Have you ever imagined a world with no racism, no hunger, no difference between poor and rich? Marks imagined a world with equal rights and liberty in his Communist Manifesto but REAL world did not accept it. Even he proposed a 'so called' better substitute of contemporary religious believes BUT to change peoples' believe is like creating hate campaign. We are created (or nourished) in such a way that we can make our decisions by comparing. We compare everything in every aspects of our life. We compare 'love' also. If nobody hates nobody there is no need of of the word Love. We never get angry or mad; it's all love. There will be no such words like hate, anger, madness etc. in the dictionary of our civilization. Here comes the importance of hate to be loved. If you never fell being hated, you can never feel what love is. If a poor person never get ignored from everything of his right then why could he expects love from the rich. Love and Hate are related. They are contemplating.

Here is another argument which is based on PURENESS.
Tell me why from thousands of years all religions, politicians has been teaching about love, pure love, real love; love your enemy(how this word 'enemy' created if there is no hate; therefore hate comes first); love your neighbour(why do I need to love him if I don't ignore him or get jealous to him). All they talk about PURE love: PURE feelings which is impossible. No decision of human-being can be made only by his heart. Mind playes a big role. Here comes the role of the word HYPOCRISY. Hypocrisy ruined the pureness of love. PURE love comes from sacrifice. Can you sacrifice your loved one for the sake of his/her love and still love him/her. We all try to reach the level of platonic love-a hypothetical love which only exists in our religious book, in all religious book there are stories about real love (which comes from sacrifice). But this love is not pure. The feelings is not pure. On contrary, Hate is pure. The feeling is pure. It's momentary but it's straight from mind or heart. It's real. There is truth behind any hate happening. Why all teaches talks about Love. because we all are afraid of authentic love. May be neither we are prepared to accept it nor we had been nourished to accept it. That's why Agnesë Gonxhe Bojaxhiu had to become Mother Teresa to teach the world a lesson about the meaning of love. Authentic love is beyond our control. We are scared to love someone because we have the feeling of not get loved in return. But hate does not require any return. People mark their personality bubble by distinguishing this and that. This extrication is completely based on hate which is a pure feeling. If you search history, hate is created first then we all talked about love. We fight then we talk about peace. Hate, the feeling which is very easy to create in our mind is created tactfully we win our believes as well as love, authentic love.
Therefore, don't you agree that from pureness point of view HATE is the answer....not Love.